![]() ![]() If the presets are very good, then by definition only minor adjustments, if any, are needed. My experience with doing that in pianoteq has been frustrating, and usually unsuccessful. Re (2), the user has to waste valuable time juggling a morass of mutually interfering parameters. The reasons are (1) the existing set is surprisingly effective and simple and (2) as the number of adjustable parameters increases beyond a certain point, the utility of the parameters decreases. The existing set of parameters in V2 is to my mind almost adequate. in pianoteq, which is good in its own right, but to my ears always (that is, in all its piano models) has artificially harsh sound in the upper register that unpleasantly and sometimes fatally interferes with upper melodic lines). ![]() In fact, I think that the quality of these presets is worth much more than having the ability to alter every single parameter down to the note-by-note level (as e.g. I think that the existing presets/variations for each piano are in general excellent starting - or even ending - points for making minor parameter changes. Already it supplies a very good set of pianos. It really combines the best of digital low latency and analog sound quality. Piano V2 is a major triumph of piano modeling, especially given its early developmental stage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |